Aromaci, on 18 June 2013 - 11:07 PM, said:
They made some interesting points about the effectiveness of a Vaccine this late into the infection. But still, could you really deny humanity the chance no matter now small? You wouldn't know if it will work unless you try and who knows, the vaccine may at the very lest delay the human races extinction long enough to come up with a better vaccine/cure.
I think from a purely objective and moral point of view, it would definitely seem worth it to sacrifice one person's life for a small chance at saving the rest of humanity. It is possible that the scientists could have made a breakthrough or at least hopefully gain some leeway into improving and creating effective vaccines for the future, which they probably tried with the infected (but immune/unchanged) monkeys back at the University too but ultimately failed. At the same time though, it could have ended up another complete failure and Ellie's death and Joel's journey and sacrifices would have been for nothing.
But it wasn't like Joel never considered this either for 'the greater good', otherwise he would have fought back immediately when Marlene was explaining to him what had to be done to Ellie. I feel for Marlene since she agonised over this decision too, but the rest of the Fireflies? They wanted to kill Joel straight after they identified him and Ellie and it was only because Marlene was grateful and appreciated Joel's help that he wasn't killed while he was knocked out (this was in one of her recordings). And even then, Joel was't allowed to even see Ellie one last time before he was asked to leave at gunpoint. That trigger-happy guard escorting Joel out of the hospital wanted
any "reason" to kill Joel even after all he's done and been through to bring Ellie to them, and if the vaccine actually worked then those arrogant Fireflies would be the first to receive them. The Fireflies probably wouldn't have distributed the vaccines freely either given their own grudge and sacrifices against the military as well.
So in the heat of the moment, I definitely would not have believed that it was worth sacrificing and giving up Ellie to people like that, not to mention the strong bond between Ellie and Joel that we've experienced and watched grow and develop so much since the beginning of the game. Also, they never actually waited to ask Ellie if she wanted to go through with it; they just assumed it was for the best and that her opinion didn't matter either way so that in itself was wrong.
I think another point to consider on Joel's behalf too is whether or not the vaccine is really the only way for humanity to survive. People are still surviving and fighting off the infected even 20 years after the outbreak and Tommy and his group have even managed to start rebuilding a civilised community and town to live in and stay safe, so it's not entirely hopeless that humanity will survive. Joel saw this as hope too when he asked if Ellie wanted to turn back to Tommy's because it wasn't too late, and even then neither of them expected that Ellie would have to die for a chance at making the vaccine.
It could even be that Ellie's immunity was part nature's way fighting back against the cordyceps, like evolution especially since she was born in this time. Then killing her and getting nothing from it would be wrong. (Just a small theory though).
Anyways, that took me a little while to think through and write it down lol. I actually did think it was kind of wrong of Joel to forcefully take back Ellie at first, although I understood why and accepted it since they both managed to survive.